eyes black and white

The Good, the Oh So Good, and the Wow

Tonight, I watched “The Good, The Bad and The Ugly” (1966) with the kids. A western movie, but “made in Italy” though shot in Spain with American stars; a road movie without roads, that takes you through the deadly desert, lively towns, and concentration camps; a buddy movie and antagonistic movie together, with a pair extended to a trio; a treasure chase, a gangster movie, a war movie, and a social commentary; an epic with woven threads that converge into a grand finale, maintaining continuity through tasteful elisions; a musical of sorts that revolutionized movie editing, where at times instruments replace voice and voice replaces instruments; a Nietzschean morality play that rejects both preachy Judeo-Christian morality and haughty nihilism; a landmark classic that inspired much of cinema afterwards; an action-packed adventure, chock full of comedy and tragedy, immediately gratifying, yet deep not shallow; an anti-nationalistic ode to America, and its spirit of liberty, despite its democidal governments; a sequel that isn't one to a remake of a Japanese movie, that had a Korean remake that isn’t one; all that and more, all in one movie.

Collapse )
eyes black and white

A Sheep in Wolf's Clothing

Some Libertarians scoff at NH libertarians getting elected as Republican, and showing no respect whatsoever for the Libertarian Party. What they fail to grasp is that if the Libertarian Party ever managed to gain any meaningful electoral traction, at the very next election it would be conquered from within by power-hungry LINO rejects of other parties assaulting primaries with so far unprecedented money and influence to vie for the least gleam of power.

To some extent, this has already happened, just with incompetent losers incapable of conquering either serious party and instead going for scraps: see ex-governors previously fielded as presidential candidates; and then again see the fights between the not-even-governors—so vicious and bitter because the stakes are so low (a.k.a. Sayre's Law). This is also how the Movimiento Libertario in Costa Rica had one brief electoral success as an actual libertarian party before being conquered by opportunists, becoming libertarian no more, and quickly falling back into irrelevance, indeed going bankrupt after the opportunists gutted it and spent all the money they could. And that's not even a "wrong" thing capable of being "fixed"—that's just the reality of political incentives, that must be accommodated.

Collapse )
eyes black and white

Trapped on Zarkass — The Fall of French Civilization

I found in a book sale and eventually read “Trapped on Zarkass”, a 2022 English adaptation of “Piège sur Zarkass”, a 2013 Science Fiction comic book based on an eponymous 1958 novel I read in my youth. The result is somewhat entertaining, yet the thought it inspires me is: Oh how the mighty have fallen.

Collapse )
eyes black and white

War and Peace between Man and Machine

The myth of the day is that of Man and Machine being at odds: Machine will eventually be created by Man to be superior to Man in every respect that matters or suffices to establish Dominance—and yet, in many myths, Machine will still lack some mysterious soulful quality that somehow makes Man morally superior. And then, lacking that “soul”, Machine will have nothing better to do about Man than to exterminate Him—maybe keeping a handful alive in a zoo for Its entertainment.

Now, those few people who are not wholly ignorant in Economics will invoke Ricardo’s argument of Comparative Advantages to explain how there will always be opportunities for mutually-advantageous trade between Man and Machine, even though Machine may be vastly better at every single activity. Indeed, any two different individuals have opportunities for mutually advantageous trade, even if and when one is better than the other at every single activity. The classic example of Comparative Advantages is that of a doctor who is better and faster than her secretary at everything the secretary does: filing forms, typing letters, contacting insurances, etc. Still she will hire the secretary to handle tasks at which the secretary is relatively better, to free up her time doing the much more valuable things the secretary can’t do.

Collapse )
eyes black and white

Siddhartha, nihilistic fantasy of the wealthy

Yesterday, I watched Siddhartha (1972), a beautifully made movie based on Hermann Hesse’s novel. The protagonist, contemporaneous and homonymous with the famous Buddha whom he meets, wastes his life, and later those of his lover and his son—in a pointless Quest for the Transcendent. To reject, seek then forfeit worldly pleasures and attainments is not the opposite of vanity, but triple vanity.

“There is no goal”, concludes the man whose very name means “Accomplish-Goal”. He invites you to wholly abandon worldly desires and goals as the ultimate accomplishment of a Quest for the Transcendent that paradoxically cancels even itself in the end. Yet the opposite is true: there is no big-G Goal, no Transcendent, and the quest should be logically cancelled right in the beginning. Instead there are as many small-g goals as can give meaning to your life—and even a small child has the gumption to find them.

Collapse )
eyes black and white

Tokyo Chorus (1931)

Tonight I somehow watched "Tokyo Chorus", a 1931 silent movie by Yasujirō Ozu. It tells the struggle of a middle class man to do what's right in tough situations: standing up to your boss, not lying to children, eating humble pie to feed your family, befriending and helping the people around you, cultivating community with your former comrades and colleagues.

The story is nothing grand, yet this movie shot almost a century ago in a far away country remarkably demonstrates a shared human experience with us, across space and time. Without sound, the actors convey emotions not through their spoken words, but through their facial and bodily expressions—a universal language. I really appreciate how they do not overplay, except in the beginning in a few comedic scenes in a style seemingly inspired by Charlie Chaplin. Pre-WWII Japan is so much like modern America that it's a great tragedy an atomic war had to be waged between the two.

At the same time, we get a glimpse into a past that has ceased to exist: a country that may already have skyscrapers, modern business attire, vinyl records and movies, yet remains largely rural, where most people live along unpaved roads, and rampaging bears are still an occasional concern.

Most movies are destined to soon be forgotten. Their stories reflect passing fads, their storytelling is insincere, their technical prowess is unoriginal and will soon be surpassed. This is only truer of recent Hollywood productions, that add little of value to this world. But some movies will still be worth watching in a century by whatever humans or machines still exist then. "Tokyo Chorus", though it is definitely nothing great, might earn its place among movies still watched in the future—by its universality, its sincerity, its simplicity.

6.5/10

eyes black and white

DARE resist tyrants great and petty

I would like to express my outrage at realizing that my children have been propagandized by the despicable organization "DARE" regarding the use of drugs with the complicity of their school.

To ingest or inject psychoactive substances in their own body is a choice that many individuals freely make. Whether well- or ill- advised, it should remain a private matter of corporal, mental and moral health or illness. A matter that should stay between them, their family and their medical service providers—as it has been and still is in other times and other places. Most drug users are not abusers. Most drug abusers are people escaping grim personal realities, and need psychological help and not carceral oppression. Those who procure other people with the substances of their choice are by and large peaceful traders, who deserve recognition and protection, not ideological dehumanization and legal victimization.

Collapse )
eyes black and white

MYOB, Abortion edition

The foundation for the right of mothers to abort: MYOB. Mind Your Own (Goddamn) Business.

The only acceptable justice is retributive justice. Unless you're the fetus, you haven't been harmed by abortion and have no leg(al interest) to stand in court.

The only acceptable police is to repel a threat. You are not being threatened by abortion, unless your own mother wants to retroactively abort you.

If someone is to represent the fetus—the mother is next of kin and so far its only relationship. Any damages the mother may have to pay will be paid to herself. Any police intervention is for her to call or call off. Any punishment deserved is for her to enforce or amnesty.

Arguably, if a fetus is already viable, and the father agrees to cover the extra costs (including but not limited to medical procedures), he may be entitled to keeping it after it's been evicted from the unwilling mother's body.

Certainly, if the woman is married or otherwise in a contractual relationship in which she agreed to carry the child—she may have to pay damages for breaking an agreement. But unless you're the husband or other contracting party, this has nothing to do with you.

If the mother was part of your abortion-prohibiting church, you may indeed excommunicate her for her sin. Otherwise her religious choices are none of your business.

Is the fetus human? Of course it is. Does it have rights? None for which you have any standing to speak in its name—name that it doesn't even possess absent the mother's consent.

Is abortion "murder", thus justifying the intervention of Government? My, Government is the greatest of all murderers, by far, and shall especially not be allowed to intervene. Instead, it should be disbanded, all its officers tried, and many of them, probably, executed. Leaving no one to intervene. There are no magical angels "above" society who may speak for a nebulous "collective" that somehow has "authority" upon the mother and the fetus.

Even without a monopoly Government to speak in the name of The Collective, could non-monopoly enforcement agencies somehow speak in the name of the fetus? No one may anoint any "representative" for anyone else than themselves individually, so no one may claim to "represent" the fetus. There are only regular citizens who may or may not have a standing in any given case—in this case, none having standing except for the mother herself.

That's as far as the (Natural, Libertarian) Law speaks.

Now, is abortion morally the better—or less bad—option to pick in any given case, or ever? You're entitled to your own opinion. I certainly have opinions, weak or strong, in many cases. But in each case, the moral decision is ultimately the mother's moral burden to carry and not yours.

You may of course practice ostracism towards those you deem repulsive. Psychopathic wanton child-killers will no doubt find themselves banned from polite and even most of impolite society. But be careful what criteria you choose—or fail to choose—to apply regarding whom to mingle with or shun—for the circle of those with whom you do or don't surround yourself will be both your reward and your punishment.

eyes black and white

Don't Fight Old Men

You know boy, it's a bad strategy to pick fights with old men. Sure, in most cases, you're a muscular punk used to street fighting, while he's an old fool who's got no fight in him, so you'll beat him easily—so easily in fact that there's no glory in it whatsoever. But in some cases, you'll find an old man who has got some fight in him. And then he's the kind of guy who's got some fight in him, yet who survived to that old age. So he might have a serious drop on you in terms of fighting, whether he is a boxing champion or has a hidden gun. What more, he knows he doesn't have the stamina to win a drawn out fight against a young man, so he'll go directly for the kill using the dirtiest trick in his book, and he'll give no warnings. He doesn't care too much if he himself ends up in a hospital bed, a jail cell, or a coffin. You see, he's old already. His kids are grown up. His wife can continue without him. His heyday, his career, his love life, are behind him. He's ready to die. A long stay in a hospital, or a prison, will give him time to catch up with all those books he eventually intended to read, or write. A stay paid by his insurance, or by the government. Anyway, he hasn't got much to lose. And so he'll hurt you bad, and if not, you'll have to hurt him bad. Either way, if you're still alive at the end of the fight, you'll be in big trouble, with a lot of time to serve—in your case, the best years of your life. And all that for what? There's not much to win, if at all, in such a fight, and there's a whole lot to lose. Thus my advice is: don't pick fights with old men.
eyes black and white

Hegemony vs Empire

Leftists constantly harp about the evil of a supposed "American Empire" to denounce US foreign policy. As usual they are doubly wrong: the US foreign policy is precisely not an Empire, and not being an Empire is actually what makes it wrong.

Empire is power exerted to rule over the conquered. Hegemony is power without the responsibility of actually ruling to establish order.

There is an American Empire: it is constituted of the 50 States, plus US Territories like Puerto Rico. This American Empire is ruled by the unelected national socialist Bureaucracy of America, with a simulacrum of elections. Despite the cancerous growth of this Bureaucracy, American Culture enable Americans to resist abuses by their Bureaucracy, thanks to its strong sense of individual rights as notably entrenched by the American Bill of Rights. As a result, American Empire enjoys Order and Prosperity.

By contrast, the vast number of foreign countries upon which the US exerts its world-wide military influence is the American Hegemony. It is made of many semi-independent vassal states that are only loosely controlled by the American bureaucracy, through vague treaties, massive bribes, the occasional coup, and, at the expensive and untenable margin, military intervention. These vassal states are themselves instituted as caricatures of America, each ruled by its own unelected national socialist Bureaucracy, with its own simulacrum of elections. But this system is deeply dysfunctional.

First, the populations in most of these vassal states lack the cultural defenses that can keep their own bureaucracy in check. Nepotism, tribalism, corruption, massive graft, are the necessary consequences of socialism run amok in these nations, followed by poverty, squalor, political oppression, crime and civil unrest. But even in those nations that do or did historically possess cultural defenses against bureaucratic power, such as in Europe, East Asia or the near East, these defenses could at best resist the domestic forms of bureaucratic power; they could do nothing against the foreign forms of bureaucratic influence from the American Hegemony's Bureaucracy.

The Hegemonic Bureaucracy has been slowly but steadily promoting its choice of policies all over the vassal states as well as at home: inflation under a dollar standard, economic controls, victim disarmament, suppression of nuclear energy, leftist political correctness, anti-white racism, "social" policies, censorship of right wing "populist" ideas and promotion of all left-wing "popular" ideas — except where they clash with American Hegemony e.g. by promoting affiliation to Russia or China, or by aspiring to the "independence" of local mass murderers.

While the American Hegemony does not have Power to directly enact its favorite policies in vassal states, its Influence is beyond feedback from either the American defense mechanisms (the soap box, ballot box, jury box, and cartridge box), or the vassal nation's defense mechanism (weaker than in America): American Bureaucrats are simply out of reach of any of these mechanisms, as they relentlessly promote their agenda, with copious funds to promote their friends and hound their enemies. If anything, the principal limit to their influence is that the same lack of feedback, by detaching them from reality, keeps them generally incompetent as well as generally nefarious. (Mencius Moldbug also noted another factor that contributes to bureaucratic influence, foreign or domestic, being nefarious yet competent in nefariousness this time: bureaucratic promotion is based on success as measured by short term impact, which is easily achieved by promoting destructive policies and not constructive policies.)

Empire can create Order and Prosperity. Its claim to fame may have been the world-wide abolition of slavery. Hegemony only sows Chaos and Collapse.

If only the world-wide interventions of the US military were covering the Globe with an Empire rather than a Hegemony! At least it would create a chain of feedback and responsibility in the ruling bureaucracy. Unhappily, the American Left instead succeeded at purposefully dismantling the French and British Empires, to replace them by this American Hegemony, putting Europe under its nefarious influence, and establishing in its former colonial possessions a collection of national socialist regimes. In these new puppet regimes, legitimacy of power doesn't stem from any objective superiority of the Rulers and their Law, but instead from the ultra-racist principle of the race of the local genocidal dictators being established.

Much of the evil in the world, including the massive poverty and occasional famine resulting from political oppression by murderous men of low IQ, is the direct consequence of the US Hegemony as spread over the Globe by the American Left — which is by no means a endorsement of Russian or Chinese Hegemony as alternatives offered by the more extreme Left.