François-René Rideau ([info]fare) wrote,
@ 2006-08-20 23:50:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current location:Middle of Nowhere
Entry tags:en, extremism, koan, middle way, moderation

Four Stories about the Middle Way

Whenever I am called an extremist, usually by people who call for a Third Way between capitalism and socialism (just like Benito Mussolini did), I like to tell one or both of these two stories. A short form of the first story has long been in my quote collection.

A carefree young lady was traveling through a forest. Deep in the woods, her party was stopped by a highwayman, who slew her unarmed companions. The thug demanded all her gold and said he would let her go alive if only she'd grant him her charms for a week. Fearless but not stupid the young woman mustered all her courage, and ran away. And she ran and ran, for several interminable and desperate minutes, with the mugger tailing her, insulting her and telling her all the tortures she would endure when he'd catch her, until at long last she arrived breathless at a glade where a hermit was sitting in meditation before his hut. She threw herself at the feet of the hermit and begged him to help her. An expert in martial arts, the hermit was also a follower of the Middle Way, well versed in Ancient Wisdom. Cautious to never use violence but for Greater Justice, he proposed to hear both parties and give a verdict based on his Most Just Philosophy of the Middle Way. This bandit wants to rob me and rape me, said the woman, please protect me. This whore trespassed on my territory, asserted the highwayman, I'm demanding all her gold and one week of her charms as a legitimate compensation for this aggression. I won't give you anything, replied the woman, for my gold and my body are mine, and you have no title to this forest. As the highwayman started insulting her and she began replying, the Wise Man sternly shouted Hush!. With both scared parties respectfully listening, he then pronounced these words of Wisdom: Justice always lies in the Middle Way. Far from either of you being Right, each of you detains but half of the Truth. The Truth lies in the Middle between your two extreme claims. Thus, the Highwayman will take half of what the Traveler owns, and half of it only; moreover, he will rape her for three days and a half, and three days half a day only. Having delivered his Wise Sentence, the hermit returned to his meditation, and proceeded with breathing exercises to ignore the screams of a woman all too attached to her earthly comfort.

And if the point isn't clear enough, here is the second story, recently made up as inspired by an example from an Ayn Rand essay.

Some time later, our hermit, having relinquished half of his hut to the bandit, then half of the rest, decided that life in the forest was not as inspiring as it used to be, and went on a pilgrimage to the remote Temple of Life and Death. At the end of his trip up a tall bare mountain under a burning sun, the weary and thirsty hermit was greeted by a monk at the door of the temple. Peace on you, Pilgrim. I am the Priest of Life. Here is some hot tea to quench your thirst, please drink from this cup. As the hermit reached for the cup of tea that was offered to him, another monk came running out of the temple, and shouted Lo and behold, Stranger, do not drink from this cup! I am the Priest of Life and this is the Priest of Death. What he is offering you is a powerful poison one drop of which could kill ten people. Here is some hot tea for you. Please drink from my cup and not from his. Do not listen to him! exclaimed the first monk. He is the Priest of Death, and his cup contains the deadly poison, please drink from my cup and refrain from drinking from his. The two monks turned their pleading eyes to a serene man. Well well well, said the hermit calmly, I am an adept of the Middle Way, and I can tell that far from either of you being Right, each of you detains but half of the Truth. The Truth lies in the Middle between your two extreme claims. And thus, I will drink half of the first cup, and half the second cup. And so did the hermit proceed to spill half of each cup, mix the remaining liquids, and drink the mix. Shortly thereafter, he died writhing in horrific agony, unable to hear the laughter of the Priest of Death and the lament of the Priest of Life.

I will leave the moral of the story to Thomas Paine: Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice.

Update: although these stories each stand on their own, combining them together and with the following complements may bring additional insight.

After three days and a half, the hermit eventually forced the bandit to release the woman and leave her half of her gold. A few weeks later, while spending his hard-earned loot at a tavern, the highwayman told this most peculiar story of his to a lawyer friend. Bummer commented the friend, all you had to do was demand twice as much as you really wanted!

That same year, the young lady, recovering from her trauma, also went on a pilgrimage to the famed Temple of Life and Death. Faced with the same greeting from the two monks, she presumptuously tried to determine which was the Priest of Life and which was the Priest of Death by asking them questions. But the discussion that ensued between the two monks soon became too abstract, complex and esoteric for her foolish and ignorant female mind to follow. And so after a while, she interrupted the monks and proposed: You two wisemen must have very sore throats from such an extended intellectual debate. Why don't you each drink from your own cup of tea? The humble woman I am can wait for another cup.

As for the moral of the stories, I can find a lot of them, but I probably should let you find for yourself, and so I'll make my suggestions in white on white. Every crime is half of a double crime; half a crime is a still crime. It is the negation of rights and not the extent of an action that defines a crime. The demand of honest people never departs from plain justice, but there is no limit to the demands of dishonest people. You judge a tree by the fruits it bears. A clever person may or may not anticipate future fruits, but anyone can see past fruits. The wisest people are not always those best educated and other proclaimed intellectuals. Responsibility -- eating one's own dogfood -- is what keeps each of us on the right track. The best way to live is found not by imposing the conclusion of a debate (politics), but by letting each person live the way he recommends to other (freedom).




(Post a new comment)

Brilliant!
(Anonymous)
2006-08-21 06:58 am UTC (link)
The short version, of course, is that majority rule (or the hermit's middle way of averaging all involved parties) isn't right or wrong: it's arbitrary.

Right and wrong are absolute, as in "nobody may harm anybody," or "thou shalt not take others' property." Any middle way is still half a crime (which is a crime just as bad).

(Reply to this)

The lawyer's advice
[info]fare
2006-08-21 08:02 am UTC (link)
After three days and a half, the hermit eventually forced the bandit to release the woman. A few weeks later, the bandit was telling his story to a lawyer friend of his in a tavern. Bummer! replied his friend. You just needed demand twice as much as you wanted!

(Reply to this)

Questions sur la secession
(Anonymous)
2006-08-21 02:41 pm UTC (link)
Salut,

Je suis depuis quelques temps tes interventions remarquées sur différents blogs libertariens et j'ai aussi découvert que tu étais expert en informatique cherchant à créer le système qui tue (via le projet tunes.org).

Je suis moi même (à mon modeste niveau) un passioné des deux sujets et en cours d'upgrade philosophique : après avoir tenté comme beaucoup de convaincre les autres de l'intérêt d'une société libre, j'en suis arrivé à la conclusion morale et pragmatique que cette stratégie "politique", reprise par des modérés comme alternative libérale, était erronée.

Je cherche maintenant (doucement) à préparer une "sécession individuelle" ie un divorce à l'amiable d'avec l'Etat : renoncer à toutes les prestations étatiques (et elles sont nombreuses) en échange de l'acquisition d'une pleine liberté et propriété des biens produits ou volontairement échangés avec d'autres. Afin de ne pas finir en prison face au fisc/police, je cherche à regrouper tous ceux qui pourraient être intéressés par cette désintoxication étatique. En étant suffisemment nombreux (100 000, 1 000 000...) nous pourrions faire valider notre contrat de divorce et rendre impossible/trop cher l'intervention de la force étatique à notre encontre.

Cette approche me paraît être la seule authentiquement libérale, en refusant de forcer l'ensemble de la population à vivre en dehors du modèle standard social démocrate qu'ils chérissent.

Connais tu des gens de la communauté libertarienne qui ont déjà experimenté cette idée ? Toi qui semble avoir beaucoup réfléchi au sujet, que penses tu de cette approche ?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Questions sur la secession
[info]fare
2006-08-25 06:13 am UTC (link)
Si tu essaies au niveau individuel ou avec une poignée d'amis, tu n'auras à faire qu'à des petits bureaucrates incrédules, et à des commissaires politiques prompts à te faire payer tes impôts et respecter les réglements et à t'envoyer en prison sinon.

Si tu veux faire ça à grande échelle, tu auras de plus tous les chiens de garde du régime à tes trousses, la censure, les procès, le harcèlement administratif, etc. Comment comptes-tu faire la publicité pour ton mouvement? Regarde un peu ce qui se passe pour quitter la sécu. Crois-tu que tu feras mieux?

Je ne dis pas cela pour te décourager. Ton but est notre but. Si tu connais une stratégie gagnante, dis-la nous. Je crois qu'il faudra des années de publicité pour que l'idée fasse du chemin. Mais je crois surtout que tant que l'on offrira qu'un choix tout ou rien, l'État est capable de polariser la réalité assez pour que le résultat soit rien.

Je crois que la solution viendra par des moyens qui permettront d'obtenir un gain marginal de liberté à coût faible. Et même si leurs rêves sont fous, je crois que mes amis extropiens ont bien compris que la technologie est le bon endroit pour chercher la solution.

Réfléchir est coûteux. Une solution qui reposerait sur la réflexion de la part de la masse serait une fausse solution.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-08-21 03:44 pm UTC (link)
Fare, you are a friend, but sometimes you are a terrible ass. Telling a story with rape in it just to get a rise out of your audience (which is precisely its role in that story) is a most unappealing form of rhetorical/logical irrelevance.

--Queen of Sheba

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Provocation
[info]fare
2006-08-21 08:37 pm UTC (link)

I've been known to do worse, not to speak about posts the mere content of which is scandalous. (All of it in French.)

To say the things he truly feels;
And not the words of one who kneels.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

The lady's choice
[info]fare
2006-08-21 09:48 pm UTC (link)

That same year, the young lady, recovering from her trauma, also went on a pilgrimage to the Temple of Life and Death. Faced with the same greeting from the two monks, she prudently questioned the two of them to determine which was the Priest of Life and which was the Priest of Death. But the discussion between the two monks became too abstract, complex and esoteric for her foolish and ignorant female mind to follow. And so in the end, she proposed to the monks: You two wisemen must have very sore throats from such a heated argument. Why don't you each drink from your own cup of tea? The humble woman I am can wait for another cup.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…